Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility". In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility", but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility" in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility" you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility" will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility", as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Is the purpose of this best spun as "to legitimize the de facto unvoted-on imposition of inflexibility by the design and implementation of templates"? DCDuring TALK 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- My opinion is: For undecided and undiscussed matters, we can basically do whatever we want. For example, if we begin working on a language for which we did not create any entries yet or creating new templates (
{{inh}}, {{bor}}) we could do whatever we wanted.
- But if we place something on EL or CFI, especially by vote, that should be able to be discussed, but inflexible otherwise. That's why we have votes, isn't it? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Therefore, I do think EL and CFI should be inflexible on the terms above, some of those are unvoted and that annoys me to some extent, but for the voted-on rules I'm okay with considering them inflexible. (unless otherwise discussed and revisited) I'm saying this because you mentioned "de facto unvoted-on". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply